Flags and Lollipops

Monday, December 05, 2005

Detecting linear motifs in interaction networks

There's an interesting paper in November's PLoS Biology by Neduva et al., about finding short linear motifs using protein interaction networks.
Many aspects of cell signalling, trafficking, and targeting are governed by interactions between globular protein domains and short peptide segments. These domains often bind multiple peptides that share a common sequence pattern, or “linear motif” (e.g., SH3 binding to PxxP). Many domains are known, though comparatively few linear motifs have been discovered. Their short length (three to eight residues), and the fact that they often reside in disordered regions in proteins makes them difficult to detect through sequence comparison or experiment.
The idea is that for each protein in an interaction network you take its interactors, remove the parts of each that are unlikely to contain linear motifs (like globular domains, coiled coils and signal peptides) and then search the remaining peptide sequences for overrepresented motifs, compared to a control set of 15,000 proteins selected at random from SWISSPROT. The motifs are then ranked according to their p-value, which represents how unlikely the motif is to be so frequently observed in so few proteins.

Three of the previously uncharacterized linear motifs they found in drosophila and yeast were tested in the lab, confirming two of them (doesn't seem like a set big enough to draw any conclusions from, but this is essentially an in-silico paper, after all).

The authors also used the same approach on sets of interacting proteins from the Eukaryotic Linear Motif database and found that often the curated linear motif from ELM was the same as the top ranking motif in their results.

While there isn't anything particularly exciting about the methodology here it's interesting to see protein interaction networks being used for something other than protein classification or hand waving (about network architecture, evolutionary pressures, etc.)

I'm also surprised that nobody has done anything similar up until now. I remember a paper about globular domains being used to predict new protein interactors, but nothing the other way round...

Comments and trackbacks Feel free to post your comments Blogger Pedro Beltrão Blogger Stew . This post has trackbacks.

Trackbacks:

2 Comments:

At December 05, 2005 10:14 PM, Blogger Pedro Beltrão said...

well, i did the exact opposite of what they did. Having a motif, taking out the ordered bits of the proteins you can predict partners (PLoS Comp Bio some time back). This way they can predict new motifs. I have to admit it is more original this way :).

 
At December 06, 2005 12:34 PM, Blogger Stew said...

Ah, I knew I'd read about SH3 domains and interaction networks somewhere before...

 

Post a Comment

<< Home


See all posts from: July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008